WSL: Should Chelsea have had late penalty in Arsenal stalemate?
Sky Sports' Andy Hinchcliffe said on discourse: "I think Williamson has away with one. Her arms are up. She's hoping to impede the ball and she realizes she out to have been parted with a punishment.
"She knows it's hit her arm. Furthermore she is incredibly, fortunate to get away. Whenever the cross comes, she hops and her arms are up. They're away from her body. Did the ref see it? Perhaps she was glancing through the assortment of Leah Williamson so perhaps that saves the Arsenal place half."
Talking subsequently, Sky Sports' Sue Smith felt that Williamson's response showed she knew the ball had struck her arm.
"In some cases, you need to check out the player's response. You could see straight away from Leah's response it was a punishment. Charles did as such well to get her cross in and you can simply see Williamson's arm come up.
"I really do feel for Rebecca Welch as it was challenging so that her could see the hand come up. It would likewise have been challenging for the colleague to have seen it through such countless bodies and from such a distance.
"I feel for the authorities yet it's an unequivocal punishment. Chelsea will feel exceptionally distressed they didn't get that choice."
The impasse implies Arsenal stay top of the standings on 31 focuses from 14 matches played, two focuses in front of Chelsea having played one game more than their title rivals.
Sky Sports' Karen Carney added: "It's a colossal choice. Considering's going through the arbitrator's brain and on the off chance that she's reasoning it's the 94th moment, I'm not exactly certain and this is a defining moment in the game. Do I or isn't that right? It's a conspicuous punishment.
"The inquiry is whether she can see it from her point however Leah Williamson hops up like a star. How could you set yourself there in any case? The ref probably won't be certain. It's a monstrous, gigantic mistake."
